Shooting at Fort Hood TX

Your ignorance astounds me.

Wow Rofl_Mao, could you be more racist?

So if I kill 13 people and say God is Great am I doing it because I am Christian or because I am crazy?

It's not racism to point out (perhaps correctly) that radical Islamic ideology may have been a part of his motivation. It's important to figure out exactly what the motivation was so as to draw lessons from it.

So...  this makes it official:  police > military?

Originally posted by brihard ...and? What is the significance of the army, mere hours after the incident, stating that it did not believe the actions were an act of political terrorism? Does it matter if it fits some arbitrary legal yardstick of Terror, or is the significance that a dozen people are dead, many families shattered, and many more people injured because of one person who flipped his lid?

FE is just outing the notorious liberal slant of the left-wing military.

Believe me the 'Official" statements coming from the Commander of Ft. Hood, go all the way up the chain and down again before the General can make them. Minimum they go to Sec Of Def, possibly to CIC (Obama).

UNderstand in the new PC world of the military I would not be surprised if the MP's were calling for permission to 'lock and load' weapons, nothing is done anymore without permission, and everyone will continue to pass that decesion up the chain so he/she is not held accountable.

TRhis individual should have been 'chaptered' out way before this, his record as an intern was abismal, counciling and other disiplinary issues, his duty performance is in question, and the statements by a Commisioned Officer made against the policies of the Administration violate the oath of 'protecting against all enemies, foriegn and domestic' he does not get to pick the enemy.

Again the media is hesitant to even mention the words Muslim or Islamic in a negative light. The fact that his name appeared on ISLAMIC Fundimentalist web sites, making statements against the US, and for his 'brothers' fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan is swept over by the press, yet his so called harrasement by US Soldiers on his being Muslim and a "Camel Jockey' has appeared in several media outlets. Like predicted the focus is shifting away from the Radical Islamic Movement, and targeting the US Military in its racist and bigoted views of Muslims. The media fears the Islamic/Muslim community and thier reach (they do have a tendancy of targeting those who offend Allah, and bad things happen) if accusations are made, and does not fear the US Military or the Government.

Notice the distinct non-biased form of reporting as compared to the US press.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1225627/Fort-Hood-shootings-Army-major-Nidal-Malik-Hasan-kills-12-injures-31-shootout-troops-army-base.html

So basically your idea of nonbiased is that they are calling this an attack due to fanaticism without actually knowing?

Other than that the articles are basically the same.

So... when help is needed on 9-11 we call the Army, but when the Army needs help they call 9-11.  Does that cause a rift in the space-time continuum?