Told Ya, Al Gore's Motive

Mr. Global Warming, end of the world predictor, unless you buy my 'carbon credits' is becoming rich using the 'fear factor'.
A perfect scam, create a problem, create a solution to the problem, create a fear of the problem, then sit back and get rich. Mr. Gore tells us how to live, what to do, and how to prevent 'global warming' yet he still lives the life of excess, expecting everyone else to live under his'save the planet' mandates.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/6491195/Al-Gore-could-become-worlds-first-carbon-billionaire.html

Fun fact, scientists state that the eating of 'meat' contributes most of the methane in the atmosphere from beef production, the feeder farms are a global warming hazard, yet Al Gore has yet to become a vegitarian, but trumpets the evils of the meat industry contributing to 'greenhouse' gases.

Yes, save the planet, but the advocates should also be the initial role models, not do as I say not as I do hypocrites.

BTW what happened to summer? Record cold, and earliest heaviest snow yet in CO,and NE. And the global warming advocates ignoring the sun cycle explination by the not approved by our agenda scientific community.

Edited by oldsoldier - 03 November 2009 at 12:20pm

Originally posted by oldsoldier BTW what happened to summer?

Oh for the love of...

What actually is the life form capacity of the planet? As populations grow in human, as well as domesticated animals, what is the threashold?

I seriously doubt man will stop the expansion of urban enviornments and revert to a 'natural' living enviornment. People demand space and modern enviornments, at the cost of the CO2/Oxygen balance of plant life. Lookj at the 'cloud' as you come down the mountian into LA, yet LA keeps expanding by demand.

I am just waiting for the population control arguement to begin, the planet is too overcrowded, so someone will develope a poulation control model based on thier culture. Eugenic Wars, War for resources and space again, and the third world entering the second/first world and the population density vs enviornment battles begin.

Originally posted by oldsoldier The research on London temps in the coal/wood heating era of the late 1800's as well as the eastern bloc industrial gas emmision data of the 60's-80's is totally ignored by the current advocates. In the 70's the next Ice Age was a real threat?, now the same individuals running with global warming, and the past year of record low temps. Rational thought is man has a minimal impact on the solar cycle, and the emmision of 'greenhouse' gasses are actually less than late 1800's thru the 60's, yet only current data is used to justify the exsistance of 'global warming'.

Literally every single one of these points has been addressed by Peter Parker in every single global climate change thread since about 2003. The record keeps spinning around and around.

Originally posted by oldsoldier Yes, save the planet, but the advocates should also be the initial role models, not do as I say not as I do hypocrite

So? they SHOULD be, but that still doesn't excuse changing your opinion or behaviour.

You forgot "???"

Originally posted by oldsoldier BTW what happened to summer? Record cold, and earliest heaviest snow yet in CO,and NE.

And look at Florida. November has started and I've yet the need to wear a sweater, even at night. Ten years ago, further south at home, we'd be seeing our breath starting late September.

All of the above is irrelevant without the "why." It is not enough to simply state, "it was a cold summer." There are reasons it was so, and they are directly tied to other trends that we have been seeing.

I don't have time to go into the specifics right now, but I can start by telling you that land sees a more drastic temperature difference every day than the oceans, and that what happens in CO and NE is not representative of the world or the state of the ocean (whose history provides a more accurate depiction of trends.)

Originally posted by oldsoldier What actually is the life form capacity of the planet? As populations grow in human, as well as domesticated animals, what is the threashold? I seriously doubt man will stop the expansion of urban enviornments and revert to a 'natural' living enviornment. People demand space and modern enviornments, at the cost of the CO2/Oxygen balance of plant life. Lookj at the 'cloud' as you come down the mountian into LA, yet LA keeps expanding by demand. I am just waiting for the population control arguement to begin, the planet is too overcrowded, so someone will develope a poulation control model based on thier culture. Eugenic Wars, War for resources and space again, and the third world entering the second/first world and the population density vs enviornment battles begin.

Actually according to an article in this weeks economist the population problem is pretty much solving itself due to falling birth rates.

You know, OS, it's awfully anti-capitalist of you to expect Al Gore not to profit off of his work.

Originally posted by mbro Actually according to an article in this weeks economist the population problem is pretty much solving itself due to falling birth rates.

That's good. It would SUCK to see population decline because of famine.

At least, it would suck if it happened more so. It's terrible enough in Africa as it is.