Tippmann says no to .50 cal |
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
DeTrevni
Platinum Member
b-YOU-ick. Was that so hard? Joined: 19 September 2005 Location: Houston, Texas Online Status: Offline Posts: 11059 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 2:39pm |
The Crosman 3357 was made in the '80's. They're not very reliable, very finicky and the cylinders often quickly wore down. Also, at the time, .50's sucked, and I'm not having too much faith in the modern ones. However, they are very cool, and increasingly hard to find. They typically go for around $150ish. |
|
|
Evil Elvis: "Detrevni is definally like a hillbilly hippy from hell"
|
|
![]() |
|
jmac3
Platinum Member
Official Box Hoister Joined: 28 June 2004 Online Status: Online Posts: 7268 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 3:22pm |
|
I don't understand the need for this .50 cal push.
I regret not at least testing it while I was down at cup, but the guy said they haven't even tested it in play yet. I just don't see the point. Paint is hard enough to see with a bigger ball when hit with it. |
|
|
"If you want a cheaper sport, go play softball"-NEPL Ref
|
|
![]() |
|
Mack
Platinum Member
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Online Status: Offline Posts: 6382 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2009 at 9:41pm |
|
^^^What he said.
|
|
|
Too close for missives, I'm switching to puns!
|
|
![]() |
|
Ceesman762
Gold Member
Time for a C-Section! Joined: 15 November 2007 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 2064 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2009 at 12:42pm |
|
better.
![]() |
|
|
Innocence proves nothing
|
|
![]() |
|
TinMan
Member
Joined: 10 October 2007 Location: Canada Online Status: Offline Posts: 730 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2009 at 5:45pm |
|
I'm pretty sure Tippmann will say no to the Ma Deuce too.
|
|
|
Tippinators Paintball Team - www.tippinators.com
|
|
![]() |
|
Sgt Richie
Member
Joined: 05 November 2009 Location: Lancaster, PA Online Status: Offline Posts: 2 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 November 2009 at 4:27pm |
|
.50 cal= more cheating in the sport...... if that even seems possible |
|
|
Try and find me....
|
|
![]() |
|
Monk
Platinum Member
Joined: 23 October 2003 Location: United States Online Status: Offline Posts: 6295 |
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2009 at 12:42am |
|
I suppose tooling for the barrels would be cheaper as .50 is a fairly standard size while .68 is kind of an odd ball.
But the 68 size just seems like the perfect blend of air resistance, splat size, breakage, and distance. Also, gas efficiency should be in question here as well. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |